Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.4 nano
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 67/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GPT-5.4 nano | 10/100 | 41/100 | 59/100 | 73/100 | 33/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
400K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.18/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$1.14/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.6M
0
Completed sessions
93,590,974
75
Token share
34.5%
0%
Tokens
399T+100%
00%
AUG 31OCT 25
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-5.4 nano vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5.4 nano·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-5.4 nano vs Jamba MiniGPT-5.4 nano·Jamba Mini