GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

  1. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Kimi K3.1 Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder17/10093/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Qwen3.7 Plus50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder54/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.32/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$1.28/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
8.8K
125K
Completed sessions
22,686
1,171,549
Token share
0%
0.06%
Tokens
49B+100%
720B-62%
AUG 31OCT 25
AUG 31OCT 25
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
66.3%7.7K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.